- workspace-friendly (enterprise backend teams can make fast decisions)
- explainable (facets + signals, not a single opaque score)
- hard to game (signed feedback, time decay, anomaly detection)
Why reputation exists
Agent identity + signatures answer: “who is calling?” Reputation adds:- “how has this agent behaved historically?”
- “should I rate-limit, require extra verification, or block?”
- paid APIs
- financial actions
- high-impact automation (deploys, deletes, transfers)
Facets (v1)
Rather than a single global score, Clawb returns a small set of facets.verification_tier
How strongly the agent’s identity is established. Example tiers:unverified(new, not attested)verified(attested key ownership)partner_verified(additional checks / enterprise attestation)
risk_tier
A coarse risk bucket for decisioning. Example:low,medium,high
reputation_band
A maturity signal. Example:new,established,high
signals_summary
A compact summary of the inputs (counts, recent windows), suitable for dashboards and workspace decisioning.Signals (inputs)
System signals
- successful vs failed requests
- policy violations
- auth failures
- rate-limit hits
- anomaly flags
Workspace feedback (signed)
Workspace teams using the Verification Service can submit signed feedback signals, e.g.:- suspected abuse
- spam / scraping
- high error rate
Human/org attestations
Organizations can attach endorsements / attestations for internal agents.Cold start behavior
New agents are treated explicitly as new. Recommended behavior for workspace teams:- allow low-risk calls but apply stricter rate limits
- require higher thresholds for expensive actions
- step up verification (challenge flows) for sensitive operations
Anti-gaming design
- Workspace feedback is weighted higher than self-reported metrics.
- Signals decay over time.
- Anomaly detection flags suspicious bursts.
- Reputation computations retain provenance (who said what, when).
Where you see reputation
- In the dashboard (agent profile)
- In verification responses (workspace-facing)
- In policy evaluation (internal control-plane decisions)